Category: wargasm

21st century fox. more than war, making the grand plan for man without ever being

Bush On Vietnam

Posted on Posted in warriors

Unfortunately President Bush seems to know less about the nature of the Vietnam war than he does about Iraq. And he doesn’t know enough about Iraq to win or leave. I understand that he may be parroting what Senator McCain is currently saying. Sadly, because I’d like to think that someone with the experiences of Senator McCain would have memory, curiosity and a better capacity to analyze significant past events — the Vietnam War.

Just as President Bush denied the Vietnam experience prior to embarking on the Iraq slog, they now re-write history to justify their continued failure to find the path out of the Iraq, saying that Vietnam taught us how bad things go for an early withdrawal.

Sadly, this means that not only didn’t they Live the Vietnam experience, they never learned it. They don’t have the story correct. They didn’t understand the “moral” of the tale. Worse, they didn’t get the plot, the actors, nor the ending correct. Those mistakes mean that Iraq and the sand trap we are in, will only deepen. The tracks of our treads are grinding deeper and deeper, kicking up nothing but dust.

Quiet

Posted on Posted in wargasm

The wise man is often quiet. To listen, to think is the action of wisdom. The best insurgency operates in quiet. Lions roar after the kill, not before. The rattle means warning, means no fight. It is the quiet dog that bites and holds. Even now, we continue to fight an enemy that can hide in and live off the land. If they were wise or even cunning, they could “go to ground” yet again, to wait our departure.

Their quiet would be our victory. We would certainly lay claim, as we have before, and prepare to move onto bigger and better things. Our troops would leave, mostly, to be replaced by our MBAs and money men. Easy pickings. The smart lions win at the watering hole. Lucky us. We are fighting children, unfortunately we are being childish in our thinking and puerile in our arguments.

Losing Ground

Posted on Posted in wargasm, warriors, webionaire

Take away teaches us what?

War is not about the ground taken. It isn’t even about the ground being held. Not in our tactical conflicts of the 21st century.

Ground lost is life wasted — unknown Vietnam Diary

Ever since Vietnam, we have known that the US can take any “ground” anywhere, anytime. We have the power to turn any, or every country’s clock back to the stone age. We can do this with the flick of switch, in the hatred of a moment.

With this power for destruction available to any US commander, why don’t we win wars? Are wars no longer fought the way we fight, or maybe, just maybe, they’re no longer fought over the things we can destroy or hold. Those things we take away aren’t what was being disputed.

Wars are won by those with a goal. Capture the flag, or take away the hill. To win you must know what you are after. If your goal is the destruction of a countryside or the subjugation of a people you will lose. No matter how ruthless, nor how completely you believe you are right, the 20th century demonstrated that you can’t win by trying to kill them all. If neither Hitler, nor Stalin could do it, neither can we.

We lost Vietnam because we only used bullets and bombs. — webionaire

Wars can’t end while the actors continue doing what began the war. Right now we are chasing our tail in Iraq. With more and more of the same. We can’t win if we continue to hold to a bullets and bombs answer. We will take ground, kill people until ….

We won’t run out of bullets. The citizenry will run out of patience. The US citizens hold low opinion of their own government. Not even believing it is ‘OUR’ government. The government belongs to “K” street, and “K” street never lived on “K” rations, nor MREs.

We are losing in Iraq for the same reason we lost in Vietnam. We never learned that war is for the people, not the land. Win the people, win the war. Hold the people, they’ll hold the land.

War has always been won by winning the people. That’s the way of the world, then and now.