The internut consists of two distinct camps. The social chromatography is simple to run. Are they a First Amendment or Second Amendment stain? Oh, and an easy self-exam:

would you rather fight(argue) with the advocate of which amendment

The pen may be mightier, but that’s in the land of metaphor, not Kansas.

Standard relationship denoted:

scarcity => choice => cost

Imagine what happens when your choice is constrained by someone else’s perception of scarcity. A current scarcity isn’t a future scarcity. The more your perception of current vs future is subject to someone else’s view, the less stable your choice.