Category: twits

War Decor

Posted on Posted in K Street Y, paradox lost, twits, wargasm, warriors

the uniform of the day is a costume … The fake department has a fake warrior uniform

… in days of old, before paycheck warriors .. uniforms came in strict flavors ;different duty ,different uniform . civilians were permitted to impersonate soldiers . soldiers were not permitted to impersonate civilians . and the flag during the 60s was a sign of the fork .. it was raised high by one side and used as a crotch guard or bra by the other ..

The Republiguns Pass a law about respecting the flag whether it could be worn .. The battle dragged into two camps the same two camps as before . now our esteemed sanctuary secretary of war wears a folded flag ,has a nose wipe in his pocket . May not even know why a dess jacket has that pocket …

from the past: [The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery. It should never be festooned, drawn back, nor up, in folds, but always allowed to fall free. Bunting of blue, white, and red, always arranged with the blue above, the white in the middle, and the red below, should be used for covering a speaker’s desk, draping the front of the platform, and for decoration in general. —ref-link

AND: [Military personnel are prohibited from wearing the flag as clothing while in uniform, as it violates military dress codes.

In Texas v. Johnson (1989) and United States v. Eichman (1990), the Supreme Court ruled that flag desecration, including wearing the flag as clothing, is protected under the First Amendment as symbolic speech]

DUH– dept of huh?

Regression toward the Meme

Posted on Posted in babl, Koch Sucker, meaning, twits, Valley HiTagged , ,

This house resolves: WE are here to pound our chests and leave unchanged, more committed to selling merch in halls and always online.

Regression to a meme… a degraded conversation makes any exchange seem fulsome, even though it is not wholesome.

finishing with surrender as victory: “We have to agree to disagree…” debate tactic of the novice grown confident by absolution from funders happily using you as front men to the children’s chorus.

?why do we have to agree…. the debate wasn’t needed. You came with your fixed opinion. Held my stage, but didn’t listen, learn. I gave you attention along with an audience. We end where we began in awareness and knowledge. Except.

absolutes negate. How long was the earth flat?

Putin or ?; T-bag provides tiny version of Putin’s argument.. history from the attacker. Explanation of a long ago childhood trauma wouldn’t be evidentiary in Kirk’s court of aggression, yet serves well as reasoning for excuse of bully boy-friend… the acceptance is over anticipated wealth .

All is subject to a business based on bathroom deals and toilet paper contracts.

loser: agree to disagree — cry uncle and reset another game. Back to were we began, except you have been given a stage and audience.

You won. T-shirts and mugs available. “Prove me wrong” is a slogan not evidence. Catchy enough, even in the Ketchup free state.

===one with facts, one with accusations impossible to prove wrong. The winner is always the one most available for interviews.

This educational model aimed to cultivate well-rounded individuals equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary to engage in public life, think critically, and pursue moral and intellectual virtues [wikip]

  • Middle ages AD 500-1500
  • Renaissance: 12th C and 15th 16th
  • Age of Enlightenment  1687-1789

// chuckroast [boast]etc

[more posts along these times/tunes are in the pot]