Blackfork Bestiary

Short: not worth the drive. No matter how short it is. Enjoy the space, and other work on display.

Openings

His opening phrase: where he starts; who is the ‘other’ of his world. Who am I to him?

introPhrase
how you open sets the reader’s first steps

First words raise the curtain, introductory speech defines the author; sometimes openings are a starting point, sometimes they set out the limitation of the artist.

The setup: in which Robert Langham categorizes the other as lacking knowledge: classified as first not understanding, therefor lacking something that he has, and values. This is a rejectionist stance. He characterizes me, an unknowing reader, so that as he ends her story by having her say: “how do you know?” he and she fall silent.

The conversation ends, falling off the page to a darkening room. Warm tones but cold words.

Can we judge the work by our expectation? Certainly, since that is what we all do. Some expectations are lower, even naive, as others are formed by formulations based upon viewing and interacting with increased variety of art worlds. However, seeing other work shouldn’t blind you to seeing any current work in view. You may miss something in expecting that, when what you have is a this.

Within A World

His world is Wet Texas — Tyler to Houston.

Is this a this, or a that? What does it miss, or mistake? Why are the contents placed into frame? Since these are studio shots, done with view camera, all elements must play well alone and together. They seem built using the ready available, without aesthetic requirement or note. An airspace – use part of a clothespin. Light. Use the umbrella from the school senior shoot. Good enough. We’re saved because of details; we are using big film, so we’re automatically in art territory.

The art space as if a bar. Any gathering place bears resemblance to, and can be likened to, another. Art serves multiple functions. Its public function is as social point of contact, by which it is located and compared. It is presented to a public by gallery. Sometimes with an opening; with placards, catalogue sheets, along with other ephemera.

Video of installation at: https://youtu.be/XQAa3PjNujE

Gallery Time

I passed through the show 3 times over a 45 minute time. During my visit, there were 5 other visitors in the OJAC. It was Saturday morning, opening day. Sitting on the bench to take notes, I was able to overhear some conversation. Mostly just remarks about the paintings just seen, but this: “dingy,” made me listen. One of the people talking was from Portugal and was talking about bestiaries. He had thought there would be surface adornment or gilding, because of the titles. Only that group spoke, otherwise the room was quiet; meditative.

On The Surface

Dingy? I had already written: “compressed, confined tonality” — The work is not an exploration of surface, certainly not if compared with work just a few steps away. Painters have to build a surface, so they, over time, have a mature approach to building up an image. Studio photography has similar history, but not in this presented work. The tonality is a monotone – if you were to see these online (no reason not to ) they may remind you of tintypes.

Since the work has accumulated over a protracted period, this printing must be by choice. What isn’t present is use of this chosen grammar. I am tempted to provide one, but won’t.

Within The Place

The Old Jail Art Center

Upon leaving a studio the work will be compared to other work present in the gallery. The OJAC has a fine set of work. Not major, but certainly adequate for a small town to feel proud.

The Larger v. The Local

Artists acquire skill from those they engage. Some of this is formal, most of it is informal. The internet has provided, it is proclaimed, an enlarged world for the small town isolated artist. That isn’t the case for most photographers, since most photographers gather in tech specific forums. In those forums they must conform to a founders limitations which are reinforced by indoctrinated, accepting advocates. Robert Langham frequents these spaces, probably without benefit. Purposeful inbreeding isn’t an option for increased growth capacity.

 

How To Be Banned From Large Format Forum

Getting banned in just 4 easy posts…

I signed on, clicked the confirmation link supplied by the signup process, then made one post. The following day I made 3 more. In thinking about the post about cyan stain, I realized I could provide a chemical test to determine if the stain was contamination, so I returned to the sight to find that: Banned for- no reason specified; Ban lifted: Never.

 

banned
You have been banned for: No reason was specified

Post: the forum founder made a presentation, inviting all his followers. They posted appreciations. I asked them to consider:

did the gathering provide more than an appreciation .. anything gained for your work; understanding or direction. Did you learn something that increased, or altered your understanding of other photographers; other artists?

Post: a frequent poster asked about shooting equipment of use at a political rally. I suggested small, easy….(clearly not large format, but he said he had that answered already)

olymmpus pen ft

NIKON L35AF POINT & SHOOT (Daido style)

Post: a long time, and vocal supporter of the site asked for reasons for using large format cameras.

the definition of a process by mechanical size restricts advantage (disadvantage) to mechanics. Certainly view cameras are ‘large format,’ but then some ‘flat tech’ cameras hold large sheets of film. large film is an advantage in mechanical, or hand processes since less skill is required to make changes and alterations. I don’t see any such assembly imagery on this forum — (only looked back a few years of images)

Post: a new poster was trying to print color in the darkroom, and was having problems with color balance. He indicated that the color was “all over” — common in early lab work. Having taught color to hundreds of first timers, this seemed easy.

if the color is in the border of print it is a ‘stain’ – either chemical or optical ‘fog’

post 2 (this thread) had the 80% reason for cyan stain: carryover or splashover from bleach into developer.

 I expect that someone complained. Since the ban occurred within 2 hours of my post in the “view camera” thread, coincidence taps its finger on someone following those answers finding my viewpoint objectionable.

Does it matter, being banned? Not to me, since I’ve nothing to gain by having access to the forum. The discussion remains by design limited to discussion of technical methods to sheet film imagery.

 Previously:

If you follow my prior posts (tagged: fora) you will find specifics about some of the limitations of the major fora.