the M word

Mars is too far… how ’bout shootin for the Moon .. Musk, a Man of his Word, pirouettes .. Maybe it may be the first stop or another step in his ballet. The Mar-a-Lago mermaid: makeup for made-up millionaires ..

Ilonka continues inventing the wheel . The quest after the MapQuest sample code 1,000,000 flips later .

meanwhile, as grok croaks, and Tesla tanks, The bland pays on ..

xai taking leaves …

Adding to the uncertainty, another key figure departed xAI just 24 hours after Ghori. Co-founder Greg Yang stepped down to focus on his health after contracting Lyme disease. …..

This latest departure follows the loss of co-founders Igor Babuschkin and Christian Szegedy, who Bloomberg noted left the business last year. With the team shrinking so quickly, Musk may soon have to put a robot in charge. Given the mounting legal headaches—from questionable construction permits to the recent scandal involving Grok’s image tools—it wouldn’t be a surprise if no one wants to take on the challenge ahead.

… as excuses .. grok is a sinking party trick..


grok4 phuds

https://youtu.be/2fQvZUIdhII?si=hrd2wZ6ytwFGpXpc

Morning Arrow

… finding acolytes… deriving this question: why is it that we denigrate those who question our knowledge? Particularly found amongst innovation experts, teachers of business development laying claim to complete, rigorous knowledge of economics, certainly with regard superior to those amateur economist participating in an economy without PhD skills. War games without basic training.

It is best to avoid calling out: “people who denigrate modern economics – the neo-Marxists, the back-of-the-room scribblers, the wannabe-contrarian-dilletantes” from an endowed hot-tub.

does John and Jean Doe, who were mere Smithies in their daily job, stand a chance — have any luck. Their starting point is never the same. Choice is chuck and duck. Which grid do they play> Giffen, Marshall, Veblen <

The market is no place for economists — Sonnenschein-Mantel-Debreu “Anything Goes”

The invisible hand is taken at faith value ..[ AI TRANS took it at cliche value] https://books.google.ca/books?id=HAiMDU4qv0IC&pg=RA1-PA208&lpg=RA1-PA208#v=onepage&q&f=false

Flower Pot economics — works in small examples

Blackboard Jungle — lots of squiggles, easily erased.

Point out a market that achieved equilibrium, please.

The main results of this paper are two theorems stating very general conditions under
which a competitive equilibrium will exist. Loosely speaking, the first theorem
asserts that if every individual has initially some positive quantity of every com-
modity available for sale, then a competitive equilibrium will exist. The second
theorem asserts the existence of competitive equilibrium if there are some types
of labor with the following two properties: (1) each individual can supply some
positive amount of at least one such type of labor; and (2) each such type of
labor has a positive usefulness in the production of desired commodities. The
conditions of the second theorem, particularly, may be expected to be satisfied
in a wide variety of actual situations, though not, for example, if there is insuf-
ficient substitutability in the structure of production.
-- Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy. Kenneth J. Arrow; Gerard Debreu, 1954