can you name your influences. How about those you’ve influenced? something all teachers consider.
Mostly, we don’t make a difference that we ever realize. The spoken word ends as it begins.
Claims on forums are a source of ongoing puzzlement. Photography is a small world, isolated but not insulated. The web is just a right-click away. Pride is a terrible memory aide.
Most teachers don’t remember their students well — students are expected to remember some of their teachers. Typically, they remember those who guided well, or who they needed for a career boost. If the teacher had a name, was a member of the canon, they are always listed on the memory page.
What of those students who don’t list you on their extensive friend circle. I wonder more about a teacher citing their student as a badge in their influence-quest. It happens on one forum.
This doesn’t mean as much as other types of errors made in that forum.
Overlaps occur. Gaps are certain. I graduated from SFAI. Was a TA and knew many of those Mr. Jackson cites in:
.. none of those people influenced my work. I knew them when they had just begun their own career, leaving SFAI (MFA) 73. I left several unsigned papers on making dye-transfer prints. They found their way into other peoples work. None of my students ever looked to me, other than at times they needed a job, or a reference.
as one of my bigger influencers says: and so it goes.
Most of my key, ongoing, recurring influences sit on shelves in my library. I will never thank most of them; ever.
\\\ dust on neg during exposure: of the camera film, or of the print. A speck of dust on the film during exposure becomes an unexposed area of film: it is clear, usually base clear. It will print black, so can’t be spot-toned out. While dust on the negative during printing blocks, dodges light from the paper, making a lighter spot. These are the most common dust problems. Dust on the negative can be seen using a “raking” side light. I use a small led penlight to see them, then using a small 000 synthetic brush, lightly touch them. They cling to the brush tip and are removed. I don’t use a clean-room, instead I clean the darkroom. The procedure used for making masks and seps is different. For a different time.
beware: the expert that can’t tell a black spot from a white spot.
A cleanroom is just another claim of authority. Like a superior knowledge of venting air: designing and building a superior vent-hood. One designed for removing fumes during mixing of sophisticated chemistry. Even so, the braggart must refrain from processing for a few COVID years for fear of irritating his lungs. And before then, he rolled his processing drum outdoors to save him from the RA-4 fumes. This complicated way of working is used as part of the elaborate reason for such low output. His dog is always eating his homework.
clean the negative with Film Cleaner or alcohol
1-3 mins
make a proof print
pre-moisten the emulsion side with diluted Photo-Flo
1 min
reduce necessary areas with chemical reducer
1-3 mins
wash negative with running water
10 mins
dry negative in dust-free area
15-20 mins
etch necessary small areas
treat etched areas with Kodak Abrasive Reducer
1 min
Add red or neutral dye to the base side of the negative
dry negative in dust-free area
15-20 min
add Kodak Retouching Fluid to the emulsion side of the negative; buff until dry and smooth
1 min
Add pencil retouching
Use stylus on base side to remove pinholes.
Protect retouched negative in an acetate sleeve.
after Vilia Reed. [p29]
Hammond: “Today many portraits are made on small films and the prints are made by projection and therefore somewhat different methods of retouching have to be used. Chemical reduction on negatives now is often used instead of etching with a knife, and enlarged negatives are often made from the small original negatives. (1941)
Cass: p81. four types of scratches on negatives
very fine. apply retouching fluid to base and emulsion
definite scratch; like hair or dust line. Can be abraded.
large scratch. gouge on emulsion. this can be opaqued on the base of the negative
ong vertical or horizontal scratch caused by processing or camera.. on base of negative and appears white on the print.use soft eraser, gently erase down the line on the base side. this diffuses the scratch. clean the grit with toothpick skewer, then apply retouching fluid. color scratches are finished on print.
References
Hammond, The Art of Retouching and Improving Negatives and Prints, 1948
” I know … was with …. learned how from …. Winogrand”
He taught me how to inspection develop 8 rolls at a time in an open sheet film tank and I have seen his negatives. Very full toned. Unfortunately it appears that whoever developed his remaining rolls posthumously didn’t know that the development times needed to be reduced between 30-50 percent depending on the conditions he was photographing in. Expose for the shadows, develop for the highlights.”
Develop by Inspection:
which of the negatives on the roll is being considered the prime, ie, main negative being inspected. Is it in the middle of the roll, leader, or trailing frame?
if you photograph in Texas a lot, then your pictures are going to look a lot like Texas. — Winogrand
“If students were taking Garry’s class to learn photographic techniques and methods, they were sorely disappointed. Garry didn’t teach much technique. That was left to the PJ side of the photography world or to his “TAs”. You have a lifetime to learn technique, he seemed to be saying, but I can teach you what is more important than technique, how to see; learn that and all you have to do afterwards is press the shutter.” — Garza (74-76)
https://sites.utexas.edu/photo_utaustin/history/Garry Winogrand was the next leader of the photography program, from 1973–78. Winogrand was an equally acclaimed, though fundamentally different type of photographer. Along with his European counterparts such as Henri Cartier–Bresson and Robert Cappa, Winogrand captured pressing social issues and anxieties of his time. However, unlike Cartier–Bresson, Winogrand wasn’t looking for a decisive moment. No moment is most important, he said. Any moment can be something. Winogrand’s critiques in class often involved cut-throat edits and critical, obtuse comments while students sat in a room filled with cigarette smoke, drinking copious amounts of coffee.
First encounters are, like cameras, all about the surface of things; getting beyond means taking yourself further. Become the artist you say you are.
You must be logged in to post a comment.