Links: BW Masking. film

A mask is a piece of film used to modify another piece of film. Simple enough. Masking is the process of making these masks. From the 40’s until the 90’s, masking suggested that you were doing color work; some type of assembly, or photomechanical process. Much of the literature was written with those commercial goals in mind. They taught the method of achieving reprographic standard.

The first methods of aligning, of registering the mask-set, relied upon steam and glycerin. Next step involved cut-n-butt, the optical alignment of the films. Lithographers introduced button registration in the 30’s, Technicolor introduced pinset registration.

In the 60’s the enlarger makers, Omega, Durst, etc. introduced “color separation enlargers” with pinsets. Condit( & Bregman) came on the scene after them. It seems nobody enforced the patents.

After the decline, actually the drop, of dye-transfer BW (monochrome) separation took root. Contrast reduction from the Ciba/R world was enlisted; however, much of the equipment that had been in the lab was being trashed during the early 90s.

Along came some avid believers. the market was small enough that the workshop world could become a market for a small scale business.

Contrast Reduction Masking —

LINKS

— Lynn Radeka https://www.radekaphotography.com/

https://www.freestylephoto.com/contrast-masking-the-traditional-print

EZ Note:

  • You can expose with either clear glass, a diffusing glass, or both. You can even put a thin glass between the two pieces of film to further decrease sharpness.
  • A good masking film has no AH layer or a minimum AH layer, and has a good quantity of acutance dyes in the emulsion itself. Pan Masking film was made just for this purpose and could be exposed either through the base or emulsion side.
  • Both highlight and contrast masks are similar, they just address a different part of the tone scale, if I read what you are saying right. And you can make one either sharp or unsharp depending on what you are trying to achieve. You can even combine several results into one mask, or you can use several masks together in registration. Lith masks are also nice to try, giving quite nice special effects.
  • In color, you can make separation masks for color correction that can also be unsharp if desired. They can also reduce contrast. Therefore, by this method a transparency can be printed on Ilfochrome and yield results equal to the best color negatives with the proviso that you always lose some tone scale in pos-pos printing due to the two toes and two shoulders of the materials you are dealing with.
  • Just make sure you keep everything in register with each other, so you don’t get really odd results.
  • BTW, a nice unsharp mask can be achieved by developing in Dektol 1:3 for 3 mins or by inspection to get a just visible image. Underexpose and develop for up to 3 mins (just about the right time for that developer) and you will have a very nice B&W unsharp mask.
  • Ron Mowrey

Internet of Ideas

there is no internet of ideas.


“Bergger (Lotus) 200

Designed by the former chief chemical engineer for Guilleminot and Boespflug of France, fiber-based Bergger Prestige paper is available in double weight, premium weight (300g/m2), and, with Prestige Silver Supreme, an extra premium weight (320g/m2) base. Except for Silver Supreme, these silver-rich papers are offered in neutral and warm tone, graded and VC, and in standard sizes from 8×10″ to 20×24″, including 12×16″. Silver Supreme, produced only in 40x50cm and one (Normal) contrast grade, is coated on an exquisite 100 percent cotton rag base”


New Bergger Printfilm

or, old Ilford Ortho Plus?

for labwork as interpositive internegative- Bergger is bigger, but for 8×10 & smaller I continue to use O+. I liked the Efke Printfilm which is what Bergger reprised in this new offer. Price same, only size differs.

print Film Developed in Dektol:
 
5.5 minutes development Dektol 1:7

8 second main exposure
.43 D min
1.72 D max
1.29 DR

AND

Efke Print Film 8x10 developed in HC110 1:175. Agitation every 40 seconds. Development by inspection under deep red safe light.

Efke Print film is a high silver content, chlorobromide, orthochromatic emulsion coated on a clear 170 micron polyester base. It was designed as a replacement for Agfa's Gevatone N31P and is excellent for creating enlarged negatives (in a two-step process) for contact printing. Used by many alternative process photographers the world over as the industry standard. 

It has an ISO rating of 25 and a speed of P400. Varying the concentration of the developer can control the ISO range. For example using Dektol or LPD in stock solution increases the contrast. Further dilution reduces the contrast. Experimenting with different dilutions and developing times will produce the desired results. 

Efke Print film tones in all available toners: Cachet/MACO Sepia, Selenia and Azure Blue toners. With the blue toner, underexpose by 0.5-1.0 stops because blue toners add image density. 

The Efke Print Film emulsion is relatively fast. Use a standard step wedge to determine exposure times. Put a black card under the film to avoid bounce back through the transparent substrate. Develop at least two minutes with all developers regardless of dilutions. 

Use a red filter during processing. Be sure the distance from tray to safelight is at least 40 inches.

Replaces item #4916 - Maco Genius Print Film
(Efke Print film is the same product directly from the original manufacturer)

EFKE closed because the plant was old and wearing out, it was still using the old Schleussner Fotowerke GmbH coating line that DuPont had sold them, they licensed the emulsion rights from DuPont.. 

The EFKE 25 (tungsten speed) film went because an ingredient was no longer available (according to Mirko), the same happened wirth Agfa APX25 and Agfa stated sales were to low to warrant the R&D costs of reformulating the emulsion.

Of course Kodak’s emulsion formulae for early Tri-X etc did fall into German hands when they invaded Hungary and took over the Kodak Ltd (UK) coating plant there which was then put under Agfa’s control,. After the war it was nationalized and became Forte. The reverse happened in the US where the Government seized Agfa Ansco and gave Eastman Kodak access to all their Agfa trade secrets.

Making do with information available —

what does he say? Seems to be a friend of Bernice of LFF … also, he has enough viewers to be taken seriously.