Regression toward the Meme

This house resolves: WE are here to pound our chests and leave unchanged, more committed to selling merch in halls and always online.

Regression to a meme… a degraded conversation makes any exchange seem fulsome, even though it is not wholesome.

finishing with surrender as victory: “We have to agree to disagree…” debate tactic of the novice grown confident by absolution from funders happily using you as front men to the children’s chorus.

?why do we have to agree…. the debate wasn’t needed. You came with your fixed opinion. Held my stage, but didn’t listen, learn. I gave you attention along with an audience. We end where we began in awareness and knowledge. Except.

absolutes negate. How long was the earth flat?

Putin or ?; T-bag provides tiny version of Putin’s argument.. history from the attacker. Explanation of a long ago childhood trauma wouldn’t be evidentiary in Kirk’s court of aggression, yet serves well as reasoning for excuse of bully boy-friend… the acceptance is over anticipated wealth .

All is subject to a business based on bathroom deals and toilet paper contracts.

loser: agree to disagree — cry uncle and reset another game. Back to were we began, except you have been given a stage and audience.

You won. T-shirts and mugs available. “Prove me wrong” is a slogan not evidence. Catchy enough, even in the Ketchup free state.

===one with facts, one with accusations impossible to prove wrong. The winner is always the one most available for interviews.

This educational model aimed to cultivate well-rounded individuals equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary to engage in public life, think critically, and pursue moral and intellectual virtues [wikip]

  • Middle ages AD 500-1500
  • Renaissance: 12th C and 15th 16th
  • Age of Enlightenment  1687-1789

// chuckroast [boast]etc

[more posts along these times/tunes are in the pot]

let’s make some ..

after the posting, the investing. after gossip is…

after barbs come barbed wire.

America knows how to make a war. You need war we’ve got it

On the spectrum… the silicon rainbow includes all the shades of greed.

getting beyond making conversation .. Ideas start between mind and paper, frequently involving walks

wealth comes from wealth . pandemics come from arrogance … The arrogant believing they were smarter than they are .. pandemics feed on the ignorance … the tax dodging wealth didn’t solve Covid … it wasn’t capital, it was the resources of labor, the pool of investment money that comes from labor .The tax of the middle class kept democratic science alive, and willing to distribute knowledge without requirement for profit, return on investment …


Capital [ kodak Who for refresher]–claim of the … no skin in the game [chuckup]

… labor is the only skin in the game … it is their skin, and sweat in the shop.

The chuks can’t see The facts before them. the facts found reading with open, accepting eyes. Instead they see it through their bias; turning the (mis)reading into evidence of your failure; their correctness… The mark of capital.. of prejudice of scale, and bias that their experience has always been more valuable than anyone else’s… their grand summaries of business, of their experience, reveal their prejudice, and their miss-judgments.
These factors explain why they wind up at this point-place. Why they’re changed, grown by small amounts: they follow strawmen to a dead end.. their consulting, hopefully, was about buying routers, not about business routes, business plans.. their sample examples aren’t even theirs; couldn’t have been from their experience, instead coming from their superficial readings of  years ago; from a time when they were 30.

 awareness becomes illusion… more so when you’re trying to convince someone else you’re attempting to gain control of a group you exert added claim to overcome them.

as your knowledge thins out your reinforce it with repetition with pronouncements with exaggerations of experience even going far enough to claim other persons experience as your own…

you feed the Warhorse on strawmen.

after everyone has given an opinion on the headline, perhaps it’s time to read the story; review the facts, consider opposite interpretation… Consider not hanging the messenger for your myopia.

people pick one word and expand upon it particularly if that word is a person .. someone they dislike more likely a symbol of their dislike.

as likely. topics become entry analogues for the person’s monologue.