F surface. Ferrotype

F means Glossy, because it means Ferrotype. Most commercial labs used heated dryers to get through the days workload. When I began, I used a ferrotype plate. My ‘gloss’ was my mixture of print flattening agent with “white wax.” A tip from a carbro printing handbook, now long lost.

The prompt for this posting was a gallerist making a footnote about a Vintage Print being ferrotyped. That struck me as a marker — a word falling into the past. Googling the word gets the wrong, at least from my world, meaning.

The prints came off the dryer with a curl. It was essential to get the temperature, and speed of the dryer correct to avoid many possible defects. Another balancing act was spotting the print after it had been ferrotyped. Oh, Spotone was a later development; we made our own dyes before then, or used Kodak provided sets for their papers. I considered spots a defect — a marker of my lacking craft. Much as some consider lumps in mash. Now, I am less concerned, even putting lumps of potato into the mash, along with fried scraps of potato skin.

As I grew in looking, I dropped the need to draw with a sharp pencil.

Kodak Paper Surfaces

ASmooth, lustre, lightweight stock. Use for folding, paper negatives, ad layouts
EFine-grained, lustre. Preserves details, used for mechanical reproduction
GFine-grain lustre, use for portraits, oil coloring.
FSmooth, glossy == Ferrotype
NSmooth, semi-matte ==Natural. designed for retouching on print. Accepts pensiling, preserve fine detail
MMatte
SUltra-smooth, high-lustre
RTweed surface, minimizes need for fine retouching. Popular in photomural work
XLustre, tapestry surface. Extemely coarse-textured. Frequently colored with opaque ols, which gives effect of an oil painting on canvas
YSimulates silk. Popular for wedding photography. Attractive brightness in snow scenes, seascapes..

1958 darkroom guide, from my early days.

song somewhere between singers

those well known. those somewhat, somewhere known.

Neither are they the authors. They didn’t originate the sound, the system, nor the platforms of engagement. They each share the same virtual space.

I know little of either of these two. The one, Miley Cyrus, I have heard of without ever hearing. A Youtube search for the song brought both these videos. After listening to several versions, the Miley Cyrus is a return listen. She remains on my Yawn list, but this video tempted me enough to seek other versions of her. So much for success. So much for my ability to pick a path to the top.

The cover singers are competent; even providing a believable reason for making the music. The difference is that difference raised often between those with ability, access, and ‘other.’

Covid lockdowns lowered the bar, increased access to music. Musicians played over the same channels; apparently, for the same rewards. Getting to play music for others. Most of the well known met my criteria for acceptance of their success.

The stage is only so big. Only some will ever stand in a stadium and fill it. I wish when they did, they did it with their music rather than their costume.

between singers is song.