Influencers. Naming. Remembering

can you name your influences. How about those you’ve influenced? something all teachers consider.

Mostly, we don’t make a difference that we ever realize. The spoken word ends as it begins.

Claims on forums are a source of ongoing puzzlement. Photography is a small world, isolated but not insulated. The web is just a right-click away. Pride is a terrible memory aide.

Most teachers don’t remember their students well — students are expected to remember some of their teachers. Typically, they remember those who guided well, or who they needed for a career boost. If the teacher had a name, was a member of the canon, they are always listed on the memory page.

What of those students who don’t list you on their extensive friend circle. I wonder more about a teacher citing their student as a badge in their influence-quest. It happens on one forum.

Like this:

Zig Jackson is cited…

Zig Jackson provides a page of people.

Many…. no Gittings. Not even a Kirk.

This doesn’t mean as much as other types of errors made in that forum.

Overlaps occur. Gaps are certain. I graduated from SFAI. Was a TA and knew many of those Mr. Jackson cites in:

.. none of those people influenced my work. I knew them when they had just begun their own career, leaving SFAI (MFA) 73. I left several unsigned papers on making dye-transfer prints. They found their way into other peoples work. None of my students ever looked to me, other than at times they needed a job, or a reference.

as one of my bigger influencers says: and so it goes.

Most of my key, ongoing, recurring influences sit on shelves in my library. I will never thank most of them; ever.

Digital EZ Lazy

Digital is so easy. Film is lazy.

building a process based upon rejection blurs actions — makes it difficult to fit your own way into your own confused critical viewscape.

follow the bouncing thought:

  • no ready profile to make negative means
  • he can’t do it, so
  • he must try another route.
  • even though, digital is too easy.

In the Blur World “anybody becomes a fine art photographer” using digital, since it is too easy to make pictures. While also being too frustrating for him to make an inverted negative on his own. Sadly, for him, it seems he wasn’t shown how to invert —

His problem is his own until he tells you what to do. And he does. As they grow, they reduce knowledge and awareness (narrowing towards nothing — pure noise).

Digital is too easy; just not easy enough.