Professional or Amateur Film

a designation which may seem offensive by those defensive users. Although not an absolute measurement, it was used by the main film makers for most of their film century.

The character of the professional user gave us the term. They used more film; stored it for shorter times; frequently altered the processing parameters. This market of film, frequently, included a tech-sheet with more technical information than the amateur ideograms, assuming that the professional would interpret them correctly for their need. The professional worked with controlled, or at least knowable light systems and situations.

The professional was expected to enlarge their film in different situations and to much greater degree than the amateur. Professional films were expected to be reprinted, or otherwise re-used more often than the amateur.

Amateurs frequently kept film in a camera over many months. At one mass-processor an informal contest ran: the winner would be the roll of film with the greatest number of year-over-year vacation snaps. More Thanksgivings, etc. The ultimate winner was a 12 exposure roll with a wedding, 8 Thanksgivings and a funeral. It was dropped off for processing at a One-Hour finisher. That is the amateur


making photographic emulsions

sunday Dance

a week of readings on auteur, authority, amateur, origins, artwords, gesture, and mode.

ala. Look enough places and voila — accidental discovery of this [11min ] video:

Galerie RM: Erwin Olaf

We will see collaboration and direction. As well, is the final work worked, even to remove blemishes of process. In the watching, I wonder about the difference of still vs motion. The motion was much more useful to me; providing me more awareness — sensorily, vicarious haptics.

[the carbon printer, Kees Brandenburg] https://polychrome.nl/

[photographer] https://www.erwinolaf.com/

and his gallerist: https://www.houkgallery.com/artists/43-erwin-olaf/