Secret Dye Transfer School

This is an expanded version of { Everyone loves a secret…. } with questions.
Avoid tidepools of inactivity; don’t get caught in their stagnation.

THE SECRET IS: TRY. NO SCHOOL TEACHES COURAGE.

The secret case of Eggs. You cook eggs at home, getting very good over the first dozen. A chef trained at CIA will cook that dozen eggs several ways in their first morning. The secret is variation — faster feedback between effort and result.

How to poach an egg… or, how I poach an egg… based upon its size, use of poach … cooking is easy, but it is a manual skill. The analogy should be obvious. I would never spend time trying to teach someone how to cook, if they are afraid of making mistakes. The arrogant amateur is deadly in a commercial lab.

Commercial labs had more information, more experience than Kodak about the the use of dye transfer materials. We even told them about ways of correcting the magenta dye (restrainer). Labs experimented more frequently. The bigger the lab, the more varied the requests. Full shift labs had more types of products. Only small labs specialized in dyes . No one kept secrets from anyone else. okay, we tried to keep client lists hidden. At least we didn’t publish them.

Big labs probably came to dye transfer after it became a mature, consistent product. Mixed dyes was the first success. Type C’s, Printons, dupes, etc … these products provided the profit for dye transfer to be a service. Dyes were, for the most part, a glory part. Those in “pickle alley” specialized in dyes almost to the product type; their photographer clients did, so they did.

Kodak made different papers …one retouchers and illustrators preferred, another popular in portrait studios, and the common one, Type F.

Would you take a class to learn dye transfer printing? Would it take you nearly 20 years to make your first print? If it did, whose problem is that? Suppose you bought the supplies, the books, equipped a lab; all that, yet you never used a box of the material. What secret kept you from trying to print?

In my experience, I have never known anyone to succeed without ernest initial effort. With dye transfer, the printers who make their third print within the first week of effort get the furthest. These are the printers that are solving new, more complex problems for most of their thousand image career.

Frequently, timid people never acquire the skills they think they should. AFter all, they are literate; they collect information, data sheets, magazine articles. Every article they read tells them of the difficulties, as the author promises great reward. What a view from the heights.

https://www.photrio.com/forum/search/754152/

Prints? Uncovered conspiracy?

IB Photochemistry — from Aug, 2007 to Feb, 2025 – a very long journey getting to a point of.. what… what does he have? A manual from a small Northern California lab. This manual reveals: the answers are on their wall placards, not in this document. [ may be Garelick, or Teoli]

someone spending time uncovering a conspiracy… of their invention?

Lack of knowledge doesn’t mean someone is hiding it from you. Lack of experience is your failure.

How many prints do you think he has made?

Kodak had a training facility in Rochester. It served their marketing group’s learning needs . The dye transfer commercial labs didn’t learn from that facility. In-house, industrial labs like GE, or GM, etc went there. Labs with many dye transfer employees wouldn’t go — the information would have been geared to too low level. MEC was opened in 1972. What did all those labs, the largest of which began before 1960, do for learning before ’72?

Multiiple shift, commercial dye labs, had wider range of experience than Kodak. We saw many problems, having to solve them with elegant, complete answers — usually at a small profit. We optimised by experience. Knew more by doing more.

big labs had a head start. They had employees who had learned in the forties … were running sections in the 50s. The process experience transcended single-vendor, single product type.

Theory was studied in service to experience.

  • Try it..
  • if it doesn’t work, explain
  • write it up…
  • stick it on the wall

Kodak Lab Days.

Kodak changed over the decades of my contact with them. In the 60s, they seemed very accessible. By the 80s there seemed less knowledge, but with more datasheets. Instead of information, they provided brochures… many handouts.

Frank M. –[ someday, more..]

Kodak’s final days … from letter sent to labs in their marketing mailings list.

We also received such things as:

  • CIS Current Information Summaries
  • and my favorites: From the desk of — the best were from Jeannette, Frank, Louis, Bob S., “girl group”

this day in 1898, the U.S. Supreme Court, in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, ruled 6-2 that Wong, who was born in the United States to Chinese immigrants, was an American citizen. It was the first Supreme Court decision to rule on the citizenship status of a child born in the U.S. to noncitizen parents.

To the Wileys-and-Garelicks: please, get the dates correct; woth that achieved, your data may make sense.

Possible set of dates: 1936 – 1957 [ much foundation; most of the theory] 1957-1977[ the changing nature of Kodak along with the nature oc the commercial color lab] . Next, the dates become, in my file folders: 1981, 1986, 1988, 1991, 1996.

If You Knew Dye Transfer

How many times must a process die before you learn why? The insistence is common, consistent, durable — it lasts longer than the process itself. People of the Net hold the belief that dye transfer would be resurected, successfully, if peopls could see how fantastic it was, particularly in this age of terrible stuff.

You have to see it to believe it… You have to believe it to see it. Is that true in the case of dye transfers?

The role played by product names in art appreciation is high at the sales table, and among the foremost forums.

“Not to find one's way around a city does not mean much. But to lose one's way in a city, as one loses one's way in a forest, requires some schooling. Street names must speak to the urban wanderer like the snapping of dry twigs, and little streets in the heart of the city must reflect the times of day, for him, as clearly as a mountain valley. This art I acquired rather late in life; it fulfilled a dream, of which the first traces were labyrinths on the blotting papers in my school notebooks.”
— Walter Benjamin

understand the magic

Dyes were seen and made by hundreds in the era of Photograph as Object suited to gallery and museum. The growth years of photography in art schools — 1975 – 1995.

Even still, it failed, being superseded by other processes. Direct to print processes such as Type Rs (Cibas, too) for Slide to print. And, Type Cs (chromogenics, RA-4s)for Negative to print. This later printing mode strikes hardest, since Kodak Pan Matrix film was introduced with Kodak masked color negative film

the advantage of real world experience is that is is real.
i read history in the bathroom; philosophy in the bedroom; poetry in the kitchen

If you knew it was a dye transfer would it interest you more? One group of people have made dye imbibition prints over the past decade. Have shown them in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Houston, Brooklyn, London … never calling them Dye Transfers, instead, they were dye prints, or ink transfers, and similar names. Some prints were sold, but so too were Epson Inkjets, Fujifilm RA-4s. Without making these as dyes, they sold as images. This was the basic interest of the collective group that had gone to the trouble of learning to make dyes. By make, understand that this meant having matrix film produced again.

Why did they keep this a secret private among themselves?

what would you rather talk about: process or *c, where *c is being defined, refined. Who asks, who would you be limited to talking too, with, if the topic were “process”.

Most people diffuse their interest by a bit of gossip. That mannerism is what diminishes a process to the point of pointless conversation.

Would people dive into dye transfer if given the chance? Nope, one [J* 826 ] of the Neu Ds posted on LFPF, offering a complete working dye transfer lab, including supplies… even going so far as saying she would meet them at an upcoming conference. No one, not even the loudest of counter pounder experts on dye transfer, and all topics color.


2011: 3 students
‘12 : +3
‘15 : +8