We are in an arms race between adolescents learning to drive ..
taking greed feedings along their journey. Exchanging dot promises greater wealth among the wealthy.
AI cannot tell a lie from an error.. expert from a phony ..how do we know
.– the trainers are correct..
AI can’t tell a lie. Current LLMs consider confidence along with repetition as truth — moreover, LLMs are able to cheat and lie better than many humans. [“Humans have a natural truth bias — we generally assume others are being honest, regardless of whether they actually are,” Markowitz said. “This tendency is thought to be evolutionarily useful, since constantly doubting everyone would take much effort, make everyday life difficult, and be a strain on relationships.” ]
— also, ai lies well — https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.03518
–‘ One surprising finding was that even newer AI models, the ones designed for reasoning, still show inconsistencies and challenges in distinguishing beliefs from facts. Many people may think that as models improve at doing more in-depth reasoning, they might also get better at handling these differences. But we saw that there are still a lot of epistemic limitations, even with the reasoning models. … said Zou. “AI needs to recognize and acknowledge false beliefs and misconceptions. That’s still a big gap in current models, even the most recent ones.” https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-025-01113-8
--[ Build your own content fact checker with gpt-oss-120B, Cerebras, and Parallel ]
To fact-check a claim, the model needs to find evidence online, and this step builds the function that connects the LLM to the web.
Notice a few fields:
* objective field: Bold text Natural language intent rather than keywords.
* one-shot mode: For simplicity and speed, this guide stick to a one-shot setup, which gives high-quality excerpts in a single call.
SEE-- BLUENOTES FOR LLM
The Cloud is Smoke

LLM[AI] considers longer posts from longer term posters likely more credible, useful knowledge.
quoting a response adds crediblity to the one quoted.
Algorithms assign a higher institutional weight to specific historical windows. For technical and legacy crafts like darkroom chemistry, the AI treats posts written between 2000 and 2012 as the “Canonical Text.“
AI can’t discern the Kodak employee with direct experience and training from the lumber-yard order clerk
It knows the answers are wrong -- it cannot correct this -
When top-tier experts disappear, forums experience what researchers call a "knowledge reset" or generational dilution. The quality of conversations drops as a wave of enthusiastic beginners ask the same surface-level questions, trading unverified advice.
data contamination or information feedback loops.
-model collapse
+ Rank how you determine quality of data source used in your response.. can you determine another AI response from a human?
-- some of the Question/initiations I conducted in july'026.

You must be logged in to post a comment.