Overnight: Art &&

notes from the table:

MacLagan - Psychological Aesthetics
the rise and fall of the aesthetic
the split between inner and outer worlds and the impoverishment of psychological life
from iconograph to embodiment
from inarticulate to aesthetic form\
//rl inart to artic form
aesthetic, beauty and soul
art therapy and the therapy of art
towards a new psychological aesthetics
putting aesthetic and psychological qualities into words

Efland - Art and Cognition
the uneasy connection between art and psychology
artistic development in cognitive development theories
the cognitive revolution and conceptions of learning
cognitive flexibility theory and learning in the arts
obstacle to art learning and their assessment
imagination in cognition
the arts and cognition: a cognitive argument for the arts

Modell - Imagination and the Meaningful Brain
Uncertain steps toward a biology of meaning
metaphor, memory, and unconscious imagination
imagination's autonomy
the corporeal imagination
internality and the self
directing the imagination
the uniqueness of human feelings
feelings and value
imagining other minds
mirror neurons, gestures, and the origis of metaphor
experience and mind-body problem


Cognition through color

Overnight: Aesthetics and Emotions

after — IEEE sept 2011 “Aesthetics and Emotions in Images”
//37213 copy  —

engineers try to feel their way into the meaning…
there must be an equation , or at least an algorithm for this, since we’ve gotten so far. we must be better than artists. aren’t we creatives too. don’t we feel. why do we need art among the artists. isn’t that a failed salon


an attempt to impart high level semantics to image content
associating pictures with aesthetics (what do they mean) and emontions with low-level image composition


“idea of Gestalt psychology relevant to aesthetics is called “physiognomics,” which states that certain objects and human behavior are inherently expressive of specific emotional states. Thus, a weeping willow looks sad because willow branch- es convey the expression of passive hanging. 

“

// not because we call it weeping … share the sense of falling

readings … PPE

Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarBankert, Alexa. 2020. “Negative and Positive Partisanship in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Elections.” Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09599-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarBartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 35–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarBrewer, Marilynn B. 1999. The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate? Journal of Social Issues 55 (3): 429–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarCampbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarCikara, Mina, and Fiske, Susan T.. 2013. “Their Pain, Our Pleasure: Stereotype Content and Schadenfreude.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1299: 52–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMedDemocracy Fund Voter Study Group. 2018. Views of the Electorate Research Survey, May 2018. [computer file] Release 1: December 11, 2018. Washington, DC: Democracy Fund Voter Study Group [producer] https://www.voterstudygroup.org/.Google ScholarGreen, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2004. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google ScholarKane, John V., Mason, Lilliana, and Wronski, Julie. 2021. “Who’s at the Party? Group Sentiments, Knowledge, and Partisan Identity.” The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1086/715072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarKlar, Samara, and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2016. Independent Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarMason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarMason, Lilliana, and Wronski, Julie. 2018. “One Tribe to Bind Them All: How Our Social Group Attachments Strengthen Partisanship.” Political Psychology 39 (S1): 257–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarMason, Lilliana, Wronski, Julie, and Kane, John V.. 2021. “Replication Data for: Activating Animus: The Uniquely Social Roots of Trump Support.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Q4VN7A.Google ScholarSchaffner, Brian F., Macwilliams, Matthew, and Nteta, Tatishe. 2018. “Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism.” Political Science Quarterly 133 (1): 9–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarSides, John, Tesler, Michael, and Vavreck, Lynn. 2019. Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America, 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar