Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarBankert, Alexa. 2020. “Negative and Positive Partisanship in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Elections.” Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09599-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarBartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 35–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarBrewer, Marilynn B. 1999. The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate? Journal of Social Issues 55 (3): 429–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarCampbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarCikara, Mina, and Fiske, Susan T.. 2013. “Their Pain, Our Pleasure: Stereotype Content and Schadenfreude.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1299: 52–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMedDemocracy Fund Voter Study Group. 2018. Views of the Electorate Research Survey, May 2018. [computer file] Release 1: December 11, 2018. Washington, DC: Democracy Fund Voter Study Group [producer] https://www.voterstudygroup.org/.Google ScholarGreen, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2004. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google ScholarKane, John V., Mason, Lilliana, and Wronski, Julie. 2021. “Who’s at the Party? Group Sentiments, Knowledge, and Partisan Identity.” The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1086/715072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarKlar, Samara, and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2016. Independent Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarMason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarMason, Lilliana, and Wronski, Julie. 2018. “One Tribe to Bind Them All: How Our Social Group Attachments Strengthen Partisanship.” Political Psychology 39 (S1): 257–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarMason, Lilliana, Wronski, Julie, and Kane, John V.. 2021. “Replication Data for: Activating Animus: The Uniquely Social Roots of Trump Support.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Q4VN7A.Google ScholarSchaffner, Brian F., Macwilliams, Matthew, and Nteta, Tatishe. 2018. “Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism.” Political Science Quarterly 133 (1): 9–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarSides, John, Tesler, Michael, and Vavreck, Lynn. 2019. Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America, 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Category: overnight notes
overnote …pad
they follow the rules and are angry that they’re still not applauded. doesn’t anyone else know their importance how life must be allegiance to the ruler of craft craft ruler duplicated a craft not technique is easy craft not the goal basis no more creative than your consumer ; which isn’t creative otherwise they would be makers, not consumers Stezaker monteur — illusionist picteure plane unbalance antipode agitpop I see bad ID photos nude: allegory of nature — distant ? haze around genitals sandpaper print — finding purpose influence. having meaning. community. exchange beyohd material making a world. or fame the big shows; breakthru showings were group shows. photography, like show-tunes becomes muzak up and down;getting the same place again and again
Overnights: 6.25.21
masking and unmasking A gathering of those who talk much, take few photos. Big cameras on big vacations for small concepts. It is over. Is it over. What is it. You're already late to the wedding. There has been a divorce, and the bride has changed partners. The digital market cracked the sensor/file barrier 2012. Lff practitioners have changed as have the main process. Digital, if output matters, dominates this group; all groups. Output is digital, input is following. Currently it is crap scan of film. Digital has been tacked onto bellows cams since 1994. Sinar etal Is a flex-lens, view camera enough. It has t/s & shifts. If it has 35film, is it. How bout ff sensor, but less than 20meg? Is the size of print important; 4x5 contact, too small The more generic this becomes, what does it have. What did you want to do Have you done it Is this place a place of unique info When horses become horsepower, does the jockey club become the stock racer club If your medium has nothing visible to offer, does it need to remain Are you providing a place for people with nowhere else to go. Is this a chat for the lonely The big bit info is available in no less than 4 online fora. None of the two larger ones prohibit or restrict film or camera configuration: box or bellows welcome. Since the info is available elsewhere, what is wanted. Control of conversation? The 2 principal forum have changed drastically in the past 2 years. But both remain active supporters of vendors. Product releases occur along with some support from company ees. Will lff include b&s for sensor style equipment Will they go, if you don't open discussion. Who will come No. Only those who can't fit at either big dog or little boy. A haven for those unable to contribute to the existing conversations on Lula or getd or the vendor support forums Alternatives Starting a group is costless, trivial. If they need it, they will start it. Drop the forum portion; it seems to have more wobble than direction; time and needs have changed quickly. Look at the founders and influencers to see (hominum) Keep static info for those who come later. Maintain a buy sell for view camera buffs The direction seems obvious. Lff, as conceived and built has run its growth. It wasn't a perennial. It has become a hybrid. Next comes impotent stock for clippings. Large format, largely forgotten.
You must be logged in to post a comment.