nutshell: Color Separations

a reminder of color separations: what they are; what they do.

A separation is a pulling apart — taking either the scene, or its first duplicate into distinct parts. The separation is based upon the color. These being the primary colors of tri-color theory.

Film wasn’t always on ESTAR, so small holes would fail; they weren’t done. The stable base was glass — not punchable. We had methods, just not punch-pin positioning systems.

Masking can be done pre or post separation. // more to come//

craft skill from the book of Reproductions. These were from ‘inkside’ of the past, along with the current vantagepoint. The titles and the dog-tags for return reading.

Choosing film is premised upon several factors, notably, color response and curve dynamics. Can the separation match the transparency? Can the film render the colors in the transparency as monochromatic approximates. Much, too much, is said about “long straight line” needs of separation and mask films. What you are separating from rarely has as long a linear portion as most BW films; not now, and certainly not in the past when seps were the king of the darkroom.

From the past; more for the Rosetta stone. Translating data sheets. Why that film/developer was made.

Dupont Fine Grain Pan: an easy 20x intermediate film. Soup in 6-D or 53-D.

Why Dupont 16D developer: times of 6,7,8,9 minutes gave those gammas (close enough to get you started on separations using Dupont films.

from 2005: Modern vs. Classic. Thin vs. Thick Emulsions’

Early form of specialized equipment designed to make separation negatives.

It looks quite “steam punk” in this light. Hardly the item of extreme, near sacred skill-tool of conversation on today’s net world. The virtual barstool has a way of inflating all needs beyond the original.

Making the process sound complex has a purpose: make the teller important.

Balanced pan-chromatism — the secret word on separation negative film.

not Filter Factor, rather Exposure Ratio. Notice the difference in using Heat Absorbing Glass — IR glass was as important as voltage stabilization in the best custom labs. The “4 shift” places all knew this. Not now. The forums think the glass is so negatives don’t pop — change during exposure.

IR and UV affect emulsions… even just a bit. The amount makes significant difference when making seps with a responsive emulsion.

Emulsion TypeRed NegativeGreen NegativeBlue Negative
PanchromaticUse Red filterUse Green filterUse Blue filter
Ortho-chromaticUnsuitable. insensitive to redUse minus-blue or green filteruse minus-green or blue filter
Ordinary (non-colorUnsuitable. insensitive to redUnsuitable. insensitive to greenNo filter needed. UV or minus-green or blue filter.
some types of emulsions will not reach the required gamma on the blue record, even with long development. An inherently higher contrast material can be under-developed to provide a lower gamma negative.

The above table was often used as a test of new employees … did they understand the theory enough to make separations using the “wrong” film or developer. Failure meant not trying. Understanding development scheme on curve shape was a key skill among the proficient lab tech. Use fresh developer. Use consistent agitation, including the rhythm. Blue sep toe usually reaches higher density than the red and green seps. Use this during your density limits, your aims, for the linear portion of your characteristic. In practice, that is part of why we set low limit above 0.40, with 0.30 being the lowest safe value for a separation set.

Adage: Mix for Four. Use Three. — meaning: put only 3 sheets through chemistry that should work for 4 sheets of film.

Techday: Oct 8

tuesday notes in passing.

Emulsion Making

  • Laboratory-scale photographic emulsion technique
  • Thomas T. Hill. A Tutorial Paper: Photographic Gelatin and Synthetic Colloids for Emulsion Use. Journal of the SMPTE 196877 (11) , 1185-1188. https://doi.org/10.5594/J10922

DARKROOM safety: If mixed use, meaning, your kitchen, bathroom etc serves as a chemical mixing, storeroom, darkroom — think it is riskier if you share it with others, cats, children… Consider this: powder can collect: cabinets, containers, exhaust ducts, sink drains. Kodak’s dye transfer process relied on Pyro as tanning developer. One lab (MPC in Texas) was referenced by Kodak technicians for years to Portrait / Wedding photographers. The facility was declared hazardous waste site because of the contamination in the pipes and vents.

You aren’t going to be sloppy, but what do you expect to gain by mixing from “skratch” — if you expect that there is a secret to your trial and error chemistry, be prepared to accept more consequence. While it is true that food is a complex of chemicals, which taken in isolation seem dangerous. That is also true of the earth we walk. I am not prepared to call it poisonous, nor hazardous. I am not careful about eating apples, nor am I carefree in mixing raw photochemicals.

I mix chemicals, and have since 1960. In that time, I have increased my skill and cuations considerably. When mixing tanning developers, i use a glove box. My sink has multiple levels of exhaust — for heavier than air, and for lighter, the airborne items. My drains are changed, with the pipes turned in at hazard sites. My exhaust vents are also “smooth” channel with drop caps for cleaning.

Reminder: flakes “flake” into dust; dust into finer powder.

Is there a disadvantage, do you increase risk if you wear PPE? What do you give up, lose, surrender? What are the motives of those on the hobby boards? Is their situation the same as yours? Do you think they would assume your losses if you have an accident?

WHAT DO YOU do for a splash to the eyes? If it is apple juice?


Acute Oral LD50 is the dose of a substance or mixture of substances, in milligrams per kilogram of test animal body weight, which, when administered orally as a single dose, produces death within 14 days in half of a group of 10 or more laboratory white rats.
The oral LD50 of arsenic ranges from 15 to 293 mg/kg in rats, and from 11 to 150 mg/kg in other experimental animals

——-

TANNING effect — if current products exhibited differential tanning, dye transfer [imbibition printing] wouldn’t require special emulsion making. Using Kodak’s Tanning developer shows no sogn of tanning Tmax, Delta, nor FP4 films. Although silver is developed, and leaves a ‘hole’ in the colloid if it is bleached out, this isn’t tanning — D23 produces the same effect.