Harman flameout

ashes to ashes .. how long does it take to make a color negative ?

if you know it’s possible, and you know something about the chemistry of emulsion making, how long will it take you to make a color negative ?
in the past, how long did it take; who was that first one .. and, The first one who duplicated someone else?

Can you say, Agfa, Ansco… or, has the limited life of the internet set your limits? hint: December to July..

Learning to make fil1m again … after you figured out what the word means you can begin learning what it took to know how to make film.

If you know it can be done . The patents for all of the early efforts have long since expired. Even if the patent didn’t cover everything in sequential detail , the more than 13,000 scientific publications available and in the public domain cover the full spectrum of industrial size chemical and emulsion coating through 1950. Certainly what Agfa ,Ansco ,Dupont, Kodak achieved by 1951 could be reverse engineered by a company with sufficient staff and management direction to achieve a 1945 color negative. Incorporated masking, that orange color, wasn’t always used, nor was it always orange — some masked CNs systems were yellow, yellow-green. They were matched to the print stage.

Agfa, Ansco, General Aniline and Film Corporation. Ansco was seized by the US government when WW2 began. Germany already had a color negative film, The United States seizure left Ansco with a plant that had been making that film but without the knowledge of the ingredients of the emulsion. They had trained personnel at the plant in Binghamton, but we didn’t have the deep engineering skill; not in that plant. However, Albert Marshall of Rumford chemical took over to fulfill the request of the United States government for a color film in support of the war effort. it was a success done rapidly: July 1942 the product was demonstrated to a gathering of over 200 . it was billed as the 20th century magic lantern show. –-Louis Walton Sipley, 1951.

early dye-coupler films:

  • — Kodachrome — too strong blue
  • — Ektachrome — weak deep reds, flesh became orange
  • — Ansco — blue-green

.. to make a color negative… knowing it’s possible. In the 40s it took less than a year for one motivated, funded firm. The others, such as Kodak, evolved to a final complete status of negative and paper in six years. Recall: Kodak Ektacolor negative was launched with Pan Matrix Film for the small professional wedding studio user.


Ignore the concepts of Kodak patentees from the 80s about their practice during Kodak’s failure years.. patents, along with multiple research platforms are rich with specifics for one engaged in building something equivalent to 1950 color.

Given that the color film portion is all we are discussing; no need to design for a non-existent darkroom second step: paper, since output is to a scanner. So it is, 2020+ .
Key to a Frontier; be done. This means a full mask set isn’t required. We can design as if making a transparency without requiring a ‘warm bulb’ correction of shadows. The output device is a “minilab” updated: Frontier and Noritsu.


Is Harman falling into the Wright brothers problem ? Or, just standard divided response. Lack of attention to goal; lack of goal?

— Film Version — Launch Date
Harman Phoenix 200 – December 1, 2023
Harman Phoenix 200 II– July 16, 2025
making product revisions takes~19 months
Summary of Changes

— sloppy joe answers —

AI doesn’t know where/what to search, so it does a — lets ask the crowd — where does the biggest sound come from — there’s the answer. Learning in the age of “make a deal” know-how.

Ask AI3: About mid-century color negative-positive systems. Reason was considering why Harman was taking as much time as they were on rebuilding colour negative product.

First answer: “Chromogenic color negative film revolutionized photography by making color images more accessible to the general public. This innovation primarily began with Kodak’s introduction of Kodacolor in 1942”

Kodacolor1942
Eastman Color1950
Kodacolor-X1963
Kodacolor II1972
AIs initial reading of history — Kodak dominant training, me thinks. Oh, those tape jockies of Silicon Valley.

Second response, after suggesting they had missed Agfa. I didn’t mention any other CN films.

YearEvent
1936Agfa launches Agfacolor Neu, the first commercially successful color film.
1942Kodak introduces Kodacolor, the first consumer-oriented chromogenic color negative film
1946Kodak releases Ektachrome, a reversal film that also utilizes chromogenic processes.
2009Kodak ceases production of Kodachrome, marking the end of an era for this iconic fi
revised AI response

the orange scratches off… not from the base, but from the emulsion.

scratching the base will not remove the orange color.

white balance the film gets a great cyan.

estimate about 50R (50m + 50y)

Notes:

  • orange mask isn’t in the base.
  • orange wasn’t the only color mask; yellow as well as green masking systems have been deployed. Some Color negatives into the 60s would display this.
  • Kodak wasn’t first with color negatives
  • supplemental [silver] masking has also used colored masks. dye-coupling, along with my use of imbibition matrix film, as mask ,1960 –]
  • At, Lutz. “The Photochemical Industry: Historical Essays in Business Strategy and Internationalization.” Pd. D Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology ,
  • “History of Bayer: 1945-1951.” History of Bayer: 1945-1951 | Bayer Global, www.bayer.com/en/history/1945-1951. Accessed 9 June 2023
  • Wentzel, Fritz. Memoirs of a Photochemist. Wentzel, Fritz. Memoirs of a Photochemist, 1960.

10,26’26

AI in defense of Sandhill’s dictionary

‘takeover’ — AI corrected my referencing the Assumption of Control as a “takeover” — guess Sandhill considers that profanity. Reminder, in 1951, historian writing about the war called it a take over. Perhaps that space is how AIs are taught is correct form.

  1. film, to AI4 is short for film-maker, cinema, movies ↩︎

Collotype – Overview

Subscribe to continue reading

Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.

Dead Cat Bounce: Tetenal

In 2018, Tetenal failed causing the photo-world to shimmy and shake. Was this the end, or just a climax in a potboiler.

Tetenal came back only to fail again in 2023. This is the way at the end of life. The crash is never complete; until there is no where else to fall.

Chemistry is the profit of the chemical photography business. Emulsions are there so that chemicals will be bought, used, and replaced. Cameras are there for the lenses and films, etc. No chemical means no chemical darkroom; means no paper. The way is clear. It is just lost in the fog of romantic versions of truth. Few want to admit they are on a dead horse; fewer will put that horse down.

This is not a work-horse, it is only a hobby-horse, as such it will not last. Farriers live because horses don’t have to be made, they do the work themselves, unlike emulsions and XTOL.

Reportedly, Tetenal spent about €500,000 (~$574,000) to acquire the license to produce CD3 and CD4 color developers — and apparently they split the bill with Fuji to save money. That is one of the reasons why Unicolor chemistry, for example, is not available in the E.U. No small company or startup could afford such certification and thus Tetenal is the only manufacturer of CD3 and CD4 within the European Union.

<< from 2018 report of Tetenal’s death.

Kodak relied upon Tetenal for Xtol, HC-110, and ECN chemicals.

Why the company failed with full orders, even backorders… the hopeful thought it would be brought back to life, since there is so much vigor in the “recovering analog community” — like alcoholics giving each other bad advice over bad coffee.

It failed again because there aren’t enough multiples of profit in each sale, and there aren’t sufficient sales to maintain a fully managed industry. Gas stations on the interstate make more money in a quarter than Kodak+Ilford make in a year. Fujifilm is the only company that is built upon a large profit foundation; that is from other sectors of its well managed organization.

Adox is claiming, hoping with that claim, that their ability to maintain chemical making will sustain them. This as they also seem to regularly acknowledge that there is little profit in BW paper. Profits from their chemistry funds their research and development of other product lines (assuming color film).

The arc has been clear for more than a decade: people use roll film intending to scan it. Some are beginning to see the other way.

— If I need a camera for film AND a digital camera to scan that film…. why don’t I skip the mechanical/chemical step, going directly to the digital camera?

Might just be bragging rights. Some claim to life-forces unseen. Anyway, people continue to pray for anther Dead Cat Raising.